Membership Inquiry · April 2026

Centralization is no longer a fait accompli.

Gemma 4 shipped Apache 2.0 in April — a 31-billion parameter open model that matches proprietary systems twenty times its size. METR’s updated time-horizon methodology now shows AI capability doubling every 89 days since 2024. Truly open, self-evolving agent harnesses are here.

The $650 billion concentration thesis rests on assumptions that no longer hold the way they did eighteen months ago — and the infrastructure bets placed on those assumptions are starting to show it. MIT Technology Review is now writing about what most capital allocators still haven’t internalized.

I

What The Grove is.

The Grove Foundation is a 501(c)(6) standards body publishing the open governance stack for distributed AI. The methodology is CC BY 4.0. The measurement framework — Λ — quantifies which AI architectural deployment patterns show structural viability.

The Autonomaton Pattern is the first published standard, with a detailed open source roadmap available to members. The thesis remains the same: the infrastructure future is more open, more distributed, and more contested than the headline-grabbing $650 billion bet assumes.

II

Two tracks.

Track 01
Alliance Members
Software companies · Research institutions · Practitioners
Shape the open protocol stack as it’s authored. Participate in working groups for future standards in active development. Get implementation guidance for what’s already shipped. Certification pathway for conforming products. The Linux Foundation model, applied to distributed AI governance. Members shape the roadmap. The window to influence the spec closes once it ships.
Track 02
Research Members
Investment firms · Allocators · Strategy teams
Quarterly Λ benchmark briefings. Pre-publication alerts when the methodology detects a structural phase change in the AI landscape. Custom sponsored research on specific pattern evaluations or industry verticals. Independent, CC BY 4.0 methodology. The S&P Global model: an institutional research publisher whose signal is valuable precisely because it isn’t being sold by anyone with a position in the trade.
Members do not shape the scores themselves. That separation is the credibility boundary — and the reason institutional capital should pay attention to what the methodology produces.
III

We’d love to hear from you.